ABSTRACT
Introduction: Adjuvant anti-cancer systemic therapy (SACT) following lung resection improves overall survival in stage II/II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) National Specialty Report for Lung Cancer recommends centres publish adjuvant SACT rates for National benchmarking and proposes a target of >40% of eligible patients undergo SACT. We report a regional audit into the uptake of adjuvant SACT in Greater Manchester (GM). Method(s): A retrospective case review of all patients undergoing curative-intent NSCLC surgery with a pathological stage of II/III from 01/01/21 to 30/04/21. Data collected included patient demographics, uptake of adjuvant SACT, reasons for no adjuvant SACT and tolerance and complications of SACT. Result(s): 58 patients underwent surgical resection within the audit period and were eligible for adjuvant SACT. Median age was 70 years (range 45 - 81) and 60% were female. 47% (27/58) commenced adjuvant SACT;41% (24/58) were treated with chemotherapy and 7% (4/58) were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 58% (14/24) of patients that commenced adjuvant chemotherapy completed 4 cycles. Carboplatin/Vinorelbine was the commonest regimen (82%, 18/22). There were no grade III-V complications and no chemotherapy-related deaths. Dose reduction due to toxicity was required in 14% (3/22). The reasons adjuvant systemic therapy was not given were patient choice in 32% (10/31), poor physical health such that risks outweighed benefits in 42% (13/31), and other reasons (e.g. need to treat synchronous primary tumours) in 26% (8/31). COVID-19 was not recorded as a cause for adjuvant omission/ dose reduction. Conclusion(s): This data provides national benchmarking information for adjuvant SACT in NSCLC and suggests the target of >40% is achievable and appropriate. Interventions that improve patient fitness pre- and post-operatively might increase adjuvant SACT uptake. This regional audit will be extended to review all eligible patients in 2021 and further data will be presented. Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
ABSTRACT
Housing quality and affordability are well established as social determinants of health through direct and indirect mechanisms. Respiratory illnesses related to housing are nearly all the result of housing disrepair that allows intrusion into the home of environmental agents that are directly or indirectly associated with disease. Structural deficiencies such as leaks, cracks in the foundation or holes in the home's exterior can facilitate the presence of mould, which is causally linked to the development of asthma and is associated with exacerbation of asthma symptoms in children and adults. Indoor cleanliness can also contribute to the presence of mice and cockroaches. Proper ventilation can improve air quality, reducing exposure to PM, VOCs and infectious respiratory agents. Disparities in exposure to the housing conditions associated with respiratory disease are readily apparent across socioeconomic lines. Low-income families are less likely to be able to afford the costs of maintaining a home, which prevents them from making repairs that could improve respiratory health.Copyright © ERS 2023.
ABSTRACT
Ken's first registrar job was at Paddington Green, then he had a fruitful experience at Sully Hospital in south Wales between 1960 and 1963, which at the time was the Welsh Regional Centre for Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery. When 92 years old, he, his wife and one of their sons developed covid-19 symptoms, Ken was admitted to hospital, and later died from covid-19 pneumonia. Consultant physician, general and chest disease, Dartford and Gravesham (b 1928;q Cambridge/St Mary's Hospital Medical School 1957;MD, FRCP), died from covid-19 pneumonia on 14 April 2020
ABSTRACT
The successful elimination of the SARS-Cov2 virus has evaded the society and medical fraternity to date. Months have passed but the virus is still very much present amongst us though its severity and contagiousness have decreased. The pandemic which was first detected in Wuhan, China in late 2019 has had colossal ramifications for the societal, financial and physical well-being of humankind. Timely detection and isolation of infected persons is the only way to contain this contagion. One of the biggest hurdles in accurately detecting Covid-19 is its similarities to other thoracic ailments such as Lung cancer, bacterial and viral Pneumonia, tuberculosis and others. Differential observation is challenging due to identical radioscopic discoveries such as GGOs, crazy paving structures and their combinations. Thorax imaging such as X-rays(CXR) have proven to be an efficient and economical diagnostics for detecting Covid-19 Pneumonia. The proposed work aims at utilising three CNN models namely Inception-V3, DenseNet169 and VGG16 along with feature concatenation and Ensemble technique to correctly predict Covid-19 Pneumonia from Chest X-rays of patients. The Covid-19 Radiography dataset, having a total of 4839 CXR images, has been employed to evaluate the proposed model and accuracy, precision, recall and F1-Score of 97.74%, 97.78%, 97.73% and 97.75% has been obtained. The proposed system can assist medical professionals in detecting Covid-19 from a host of other pulmonary diseases with a high probability. © 2023 IEEE.
ABSTRACT
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide, with a relatively low 5-year survival rate. Although there are some therapies against lung cancer, new effective treatment options are urgently required. Recently during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen that SARSCoV-2 binds to its receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) via spike S1 to enter the cells. This study underlines the importance of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 in inducing death in human lung cancer cells. Interestingly, we have seen that recombinant spike S1 treatment at very low doses led to death of human A549 lung cancer cells. On the other hand, boiled recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 remained unable to induce death, suggesting that the induction of cell death in A549 cells was due to native SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 protein. SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-induced A549 cell death was also inhibited by neutralizing antibodies against spike S1 and ACE2. Moreover, our newly designed wild type ACE2-interacting domain of SARS-CoV-2 (wtAIDS), but not mAIDS, peptide also attenuated SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-induced cell death, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 spike S1- induced death in lung cancer cells depends on its interaction with ACE2 receptor. Similarly, recombinant spike S1 treatment also led to death of H1299 and H358 human lung cancer cells. Finally, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) intoxication led to the formation tumors in lungs of A/J mice and alternate day intranasal treatment with low dose of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 from 22-weeks of NNK insult (late stage) led to induced apoptosis and tumor regression in the lungs. These studies indicate that recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein may have implications in the treatment of lung cancer.
ABSTRACT
Background: Older patients with cancer are at a higher risk of invasive infections. Vaccination is an effective approach to decrease the mortality and morbidity associated with infections. Objective(s): Our primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of older patients with cancer who had received routine vaccinations against pneumococcal, influenza, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our secondary objective was to identify the factors associated with vaccine uptake such as age, sex, education, marital status, comorbidities, and place of residence. Material(s) and Method(s): This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the geriatric oncology outpatient clinic of the Department of Medical Oncology at the Tata Memorial Hospital, a tertiary care cancer hospital in Mumbai, India, from February 2020 to January 2023. We included all patients aged >=60 years who were evaluated in the geriatric oncology clinic during the study period and for whom the immunization details were available. The uptake of COVID-19 vaccine was calculated from March 2021 onwards, which was when the COVID-19 vaccine became available to patients aged >=60 years in India. Result(s): We enrolled 1762 patients;1342 (76.2%) were male. The mean age was 68.4 (SD, 5.8) years;795 (45%) patients were from the west zone of India. Only 12 (0.68%) patients had received the pneumococcal vaccine, and 13 (0.7%) had received the influenza vaccine. At least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine had been taken by 1302 of 1562 patients (83.3%). On univariate logistic regression, education, marital status, geographic zone of residence, and primary tumor site were correlated with the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine. Factors associated with a greater COVID-19 vaccine uptake included education (up to Std 10 and higher vs. less than Std 10: Odds Ratio [OR], 1.46;95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.99;P = 0.018, and illiterate vs. less than Std 10: OR, 0.70;95% CI, 0.50-0.99;P = 0.041), marital status (unmarried vs. married: OR, 0.27;95% CI, 0.08-1.08;P = 0.046, and widow/widower vs. married: OR, 0.67;95% CI, 0.48-0.94;P = 0.017), lung and gastrointestinal vs. head-and-neck primary tumors (lung cancer vs. head-and-neck cancer: OR, 1.60;95% CI, 1.02-2.47;P = 0.038, and gastrointestinal vs.head-and-neck cancer: OR, 2.18;95% CI, 1.37-3.42;P < 0.001), and place of residence (west zone vs. central India: OR, 0.34;95% CI, 0.13-0.75;P = 0.015). Conclusion(s): Fewer than 1 in 100 older Indian patients with cancer receive routine immunization with influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Hearteningly, the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in older Indian patients with cancer is over 80%, possibly due to the global recognition of its importance during the pandemic. Similar measures as those used to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic may be beneficial to increase the uptake of routine vaccinations.Copyright © 2023 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment.
ABSTRACT
According to the World Health Organization, Tuberculosis (TB) is the second leading cause of death by a single infectious disease behind COVID-19. Despite a century of effort, the current TB vaccine does not effectively prevent pulmonary TB, promote herd immunity, or prevent transmission. Therefore, we seek to develop a genetic prophylaxis for TB. We have determined D-cycloserine to be the optimal target for this approach due to its relatively short six-enzyme biosynthetic pathway. D-CS is a second-line antibiotic for TB that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis. The first committed step towards D-CS synthesis is catalyzed by the L-serine-O-acetyltransferase (DcsE) which converts L-serine and acetyl-CoA to O-acetyl-L-serine (L-OAS). To test if the D-CS pathway could be an effective prophylaxis for TB in human cells, we endeavored to express DcsE in human cells and test its functionality. We overexpressed DcsE tagged with FLAG and GFP in A549 lung cancer cells as determined using fluorescence microscopy. We observed that purified DcsE catalyzed the synthesis of L-OAS as observed by HPLC-MS. Therefore, DcsE synthesized in human cells is a functional enzyme capable of converting L-serine and acetyl-CoA to L-OAS demonstrating the first step towards DCS production in human cells.Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, together with the cost-of- living crisis, have shone a light on health inequalities running through our society - not least in UK lung cancer. Lung cancer has the widest deprivation gap of all cancers. Despite published data about socio-economic factors, the amount of evidence available about other health inequalities is poor. Method(s): The Bridging the Gap report is the output from a Health Inequalities focus-group meeting of the UKLCC's Clinical Advisory Group in June 2022. These opinions were supplemented by views and information gathered from 15 interviews with leading lung cancer and health inequalities experts, from across the four UK nations in August/September 2022. Further desk research and literature reviews were carried out over the same period. Result(s): The report calls for a 'comprehensive' approach to data collection on health inequalities - to bridge gaps in current knowledge, improve outcomes and ensure people with lung cancer have equitable access to diagnosis, treatment, and care - wherever they live and from whatever background. Key recommendations include: * Extending the remit of the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) to collect more data on ethnicity, LGBTQ+ and other health inequality factors - such as gender, religion and disability. * Establishing a single, coordinated data strategy, compiling evidence on health inequalities at local, regional and national levels. * Introducing a Personal Care and Access Card scheme, carried by the patient, combining their Holistic Needs Assessment information with their personal treatment and care plan to facilitate transfer of information between hospitals and specialists. * Disease awareness campaigns targeted to address local needs and communities. Conclusion(s): The UKLCC believes that - with the implementation of these recommendations and support from policy makers, commissioners and clinicians - we can successfully mitigate health inequalities in lung cancer and have further impact on lung cancer outcomes. Report accessible here: www.uklcc.org.uk/our-reports Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
ABSTRACT
The traditional de novo drug discovery is time consuming, costly and in some instances the drugs will fail to treat the disease which result in a huge loss to the organization. Drug repurposing is an alternative drug discovery process to overcome the limitations of the De novo drug discovery process. Ithelps for the identification of drugs to the rare diseases as well as in the pandemic situationwithin short span of time in a cost-effective way. The underlying principle of drug repurposing is that most of the drugs identified on a primary purpose have shown to treat other diseases also. One such example is Tocilizumab is primarily used for rheumatoid arthritis and it is repurposed to treat cancer and COVID-19. At present, nearly30% of the FDA approved drugs to treat various diseases are repurposed drugs. The drug repurposing is either drug-centric or disease centric and can be studied by using both experimental and in silico studies. The in silico repurpose drug discovery process is more efficient as it screens thousands of compounds from the diverse libraries within few days by various computational methods like Virtual screening, Docking, MD simulations,Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), etc. with certain limitations.These limitationscan be addressed by effective integration of advanced technologies to identify a novel multi-purpose drug.Copyright © 2023, Association of Biotechnology and Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the US with an estimated 236,740 new cases and 130,180 deaths expected in 2022. While early detection with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality by at least 20%, there has been a low uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) use in the US. The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruption in cancer screening. Yet, little is known about how COVID-19 impacted already low use of LCS. This study aims to estimate LCS use before (2019) and during (2020 and 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic among LCS-eligible population in the US. Method(s): We used population-based, nationally representative, cross-section data from the 2019 (n=4,484), 2020 (n=1,239) and 2021 (n=1,673) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Lung Cancer Screening module. The outcome was self-reported LCS use among eligible adults in the past 12 months. For 2019 and 2020, the eligibility was defined based on US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) initial criteria-adults aged 55 to 80 years old, who were current and former smokers (had quit within the past 15 years) with at least 30 pack years of smoking history. For 2021, we used the USPSTF updated criteria- adults aged 50 to 80 years, current and former smokers (who had quit within the past 15 years) with at least 20 pack years of smoking history. We applied sampling weights to account for the complex survey design to generate population estimates and conducted weighted descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. Result(s): Overall, there were an estimated 1,559,137 LCS-eligible respondents from 16 US states in 2019 (AZ, ID, KY, ME, MN, MS, MT, NC, ND, PA, RI, SC, UT, VT, WV, WI), 200,301 LCS-eligible respondents from five states in 2020 (DE, ME, NJ, ND, SD), and 668,359 LCS-eligible respondents from four states in 2021 (ME, MI, NJ, RI). Among 2,427,797 LCS-eligible adults, 254,890;38,875;and 122,240 individuals reported receiving LCS in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Overall, 16.4% (95% CI 14.4-18.5), 19.4% (95% CI 15.3-24.3), and 18.3% (95% CI 15.6-21.3) received LCS during 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. In all years, the proportion of LCS use was higher among adults aged 65-74, insured, those with fair and poor health, lung disease and history of cancer (other than lung cancer). In 2020, a higher proportion of adults living in urban areas reported receiving LCS compared to those living in rural areas (20.36% vs. 12.7%, p=0.01). Compared to non-Hispanic White adults, the odds of receiving LCS was lower among Hispanic adults and higher among Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native adults in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Conclusion(s): LCS uptake remains low in the US. An estimated 2,011,792 adults at high-risk for developing lung cancer did not receive LCS during 2019, 2020 and 2021. Efforts should be focused to increase LCS awareness and uptake across the US to reduce lung cancer burden.
ABSTRACT
Since its inception, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care as a whole. Cancer patients in general and those suffering from lung cancer in particular are a vulnerable group because of their many intrinsic characteristics and care needs. How SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection affects these patients regarding their risk of infection and outcome in this patient cohort is still to be determined. In this review, we tried to summarize our main concerns regarding COVID-19 in the context of cancer patients from a clinical and multidisciplinary approach. Different types of lung cancer treatments (chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy) may also influence the risk of infection and condition the patient's risk of having a worse outcome. Lung cancer patients require frequent radiologic study follow-ups, which may be affected by COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 related incidental radiologic findings can appear in routinely scheduled radiology tests, which may be difficult to interpret. Also cancer treatment induced pneumonitis may have similar radiologic features similar to those in acute SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and lead to a wrong diagnosis. The different health care needs, the requirement for continuous health care access and follow-ups, and the clinical traials in which this patient population might be enrrolled are all being affected by the current COVID-19 health crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has put health care providers and institutions in difficult situations and obliged them to face challenging ethical scenarios. These issues, in turn, have also affected the psychological well-being of health care workers.Copyright © The Author(s) 2021.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Croatian National Cancer Registry of Croatian Institute for Public Health reported that in year 2020 lung cancer was the second most common cancer site diagnosed in men with 16% and the third most common in women with 10% incidence among all cancer sites. Unfortunatelly lung cancer has the highest mortality in both men and women. Haematological malignancies had 7% share in all malignancies in both male and female cances cases. In 2020 190 newly diagnosed cases of lymphatic leukemia in men and 128 cases in women were reporeted, meaning 1.5 and 1.2% of all malignancies, respectively. Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is an advanced age disease and incidence increases with age. Impaired immunity, T and B cell dysfunction in CLL, chromosomal aberations, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and genetic factors can all cause secondary malignancies. Co- occurence of solid tumors and CLL is very rare. Although patiens with CLL have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies including lung carcinoma, the data about their clinical outcomes are lacking. Parekh et al. retrospectively analyzed patients with simultaneous CLL and lung carcinoma over a 20-year period, and they found that ~2% of patients with CLL actually developed lung carcinoma. The authors claimed that up to 38% of patients will also develop a third neoplasm more likely of the skin (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma), larynx (laryngeal carcinoma) or colon. Currently there are no specific guidelines for concurrent CLL and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. Usually, when the tumors are diagnosed simultaneously, treatment is based to target the most aggressive malignancy, as the clinical outcomes depend on the response of the tumor with the poorest prognosis. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Case report: A patient with history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 2019 (at the age of 71) with B chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bulky tumor (inguinal lymph nodes 8x5 cm), stage B according to Binet, intermediate risk. He was treated with 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab/cyclofosfamid/fludarabine). In 10/2019 remission was confirmed, but MSCT described tumor in the posterior segment of upper right lung lobe measuring 20x17 mm and bilateral metastases up to 11 mm. Bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed, and EGFR neg, ALK neg, ROS 1 neg, PD-L1>50% adenocarcinoma was confirmed. He was referred to Clinical Hospital Center Osijek where monotherapy with pembrolizumab in a standard dose of 200 mg intravenously was started in 01/2020. Partial remission was confirmed in October 2020. Immunotherapy was discontinued due to development of pneumonitis, dysphagia and severe weight loss (20kg), but without radiologically confirmed disease progression. At that time he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Gastroscopy has shown erosive gastritis with active duodenal ulcus, Forrest III. Supportive therapy and proton pump inhibitor were introduced. After complete regression of pneumonitis, improvement of general condition and resolution of dysphagia, no signs of lung cancer progression were found and pembrolizumab was reintroduced in 12/2021. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 01/2021 and levothyroxine replacement ther apy was started. In 03/2021 he underwent surgical removal of basal cell carcinoma of skin on the right temporal region with lobe reconstruction. From 02/2021, when pembrolizumab was reintroduced, regression in tumor size was continously confirmed with complete recovery of general condition. He was hospitalized for COVID 19 infection in 09/2021, and due to complications pembrolizumab was discontinued till 11/2021. Lung cancer immunotherapy proceeded till 11/2022, when Multidisciplinary team decided to finish pembrolizumab because of CLL relapse. CLL was in remission till August 2022 when due to B symptoms, lymphcytosis, anemia and generalized lymphadenopathy, hematological workup including biopsy of cervical lymph node was performed and CLL/SLL relapse was confirmed. Initially chlorambucil was introduced, but disease was refractory. Based on cytogenetic test results (IGHV unmutated, negative TP53) and due to cardiovascular comorbidity (contraindication for BTK inhibitors) venetoclax and rituximab were started in 01/2023. After just 1 cycle of treatment normal blood count as well as regression of B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy occured, indicating the probability of complete disease remission. In our patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma excellent disease control is achieved during 41 month of treatment in first line setting. Furthermore, relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL is currently in confirmed remission. Conclusion(s): Successful treatment of patients with multiple primary malignancies is based on multidisciplinarity, early recognition and management of side effects, treatment of comorbidities with the aim of prolonging life, controlling symptoms of disease and preserving quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with cancer are at a higher risk of severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and mortality. Therefore, widespread COVID-19 vaccination is required to attain herd immunity. Objective(s): We aimed to evaluate the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine in Indian patients with cancer and to collect information regarding vaccine hesitancy and factors that contributed to vaccine hesitancy. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a questionnaire-based survey conducted between May 7, 2021 and June 10, 2021 in patients aged 45 years and over, with solid tumors. The primary end points of the study were the proportion of Indian patients with cancer aged 45 years and older who had not received the COVID-19 vaccine, and the reasons why these patients had not received the COVID-19 vaccine. Our secondary end points were the proportion of patients with a history of COVID-19 infection, and the proportion of the patients who had vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, we attempted to assess the factors that could impact vaccine hesitancy. Result(s): A total of 435 patients were included in the study. Of these, 348 (80%) patients had not received even a single dose of the COVID-19 vaccine;66 (15.2%) patients had received the first dose, and 21 (4.8%) had received both the doses. Approximately half (47.1%) of the patients reported that they took the COVID-19 vaccine based on the advice from a doctor. The reasons for not taking the COVID-19 vaccine could be considered as vaccine hesitancy in 259 (77%) patients. The two most common reasons were fear in 124 (38%) patients (fear of side-effects and of the impact of the vaccine on the cancer/therapy) and lack of information in 87 (26.7%) patients. On the multivariate analysis, the two factors found to be significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy were a lower educational level (OR, 1.78;95% CI, 1-3.17;P = 0.048) and a lack of prior advice regarding the COVID-19 vaccine (OR, 2.80;95% CI, 1.73-4.53;P < 0.001). Conclusion(s): Vaccine hesitancy is present in over half of our patients, and the most common reasons are a fear of the vaccine impacting the cancer therapy, fear of side-effects, and lack of information. Widespread vaccination can only be attained if systematic programs for education and dissemination of information regarding the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine are given as much importance as fortification of the vaccination supply and distribution system.Copyright © 2021 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lung cancer patients often have a number of comorbidities which impacts patient mortality and morbidity rates. Lifestyle changes for this group of patients have the potential to positively impact both quality of life and longevity. The Yorkshire Cancer Research funded Prehabilitation Radiotherapy Exercise smoking Habit cessation And Balanced diet Study (PREHABS) was designed to determine if it is feasible to embed interventions promoting a healthier lifestyle into the radical lung radiotherapy pathway. Method(s): The PREHABS study was led by therapeutic radiographers trained in smoking cessation provision, motivational interviewing, informed consent and good clinical practice and a dietitian. Radiographers screened and consented study participants, delivered the exercise intervention and up to 12-weeks of smoking cessation support, whilst dietary advice was provided by the dietitian. Patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), were referred to a community based pulmonary rehabilitation service rather than the PREHABS exercise intervention. Ethical and regulatory approvals were secured in September 2021. Result(s): 61 patients were recruited between September 2021 and October 2022. The majority were female (n=42), mean age 73.1 years (SD 9.36 years). Discussion(s): In addition to the training requirements detailed above and the challenges of COVID-19, the radiographers had to become adept in a number of study-specific aspects including writing the study standard operating procedures (SOPs), creating a study organisational workflow and patient recruitment. The PREHABS study has broadened the radiographer's perspective beyond the radiotherapy department, by further understanding the complex comorbidities that lung cancer patients present with, how to motivate patients to positively change their lifestyle, and how the side effects caused by cancer treatment can affect a patient's ability to change their lifestyle. Conclusion(s): Therapeutic radiographers, after appropriate training, are capable of delivering lifestyle intervention support within a radical lung cancer radiotherapy pathway. Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
ABSTRACT
Several medicines were approved as first treatments, including Gilead Sciences' Veklury (remdesivir) for patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization (4);Amivas' artesunate for injection for severe malaria (5);Horizon Therapeutics Ireland DAC's Tepezza (teprotumumab-trbw), an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) for treating thyroid eye disease (6);and Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical's Dojolvi (triheptanoin) and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals' Oxlumo (lumasiran), both first treatments for metabolic disorders-Dojolvi for treating paediatric and adult patients with molecularly confirmed long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorders (7) and Oxlumo (lumasiran) for treating the rare genetic disorder, primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (8). Blueprint Medicines Corporation) for treating unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours harboring a platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha exon 18 mutation (9);Koselugo (selumetinib, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals), for neurofibromatosis type 1 (10);Pemazyre (pemigatinib, Incyte Corporation), for certain types of previously treated, advanced bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma) (11);Tabrecta (capmatinib, Novartis) for non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and whose tumours have mutations that lead to MET exon 14 skipping (12);and Retevmo (selpercatinib, Loxo Oncology, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company) for treating three types of tumours with alterations of the "rearranged during transfection" gene (13). Gilead, "U.S. FDA Approves Kite's Tecartus, the First and Only CAR T Treatment for Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma," Press Release, 24 July 2020.
ABSTRACT
Air pollution, climate and population health are closely related in terms of their impacts on respiratory health and lung cancer. Air pollutants contribute to the exacerbation of chronic respiratory problems such as COPD and asthma. Air pollutants are also toxic and carcinogenic, initiating and promoting lung cancer development. Climate change in relation to environmental pollution affects the geographical distribution of food supply and diseases such as pneumonia in adults and children. The threat of air pollution, and hence global warming and climate changes, and their effects on population and respiratory health, is an imminent threat to the world and deserves immediate and sustainable combating strategies and efforts. The goals are to increase public awareness and engagement in action, with alignment of international collaboration and policy, and with steering towards further research. Now is the prime time for international collaborative efforts on planning and actions to fight air pollution and climate change before it is too late.Copyright © ERS 2021.
ABSTRACT
Lack of access to cancer prevention education, early screening, and timely treatment, particularly in low socioeconomic, underserved communities, are cited as substantial barriers to improving survivorship. Outreach educational efforts with on-site screenings offered in partnership with community groups are known to be valuable in encouraging community members' uptake of healthy behaviors and adherence to screening recommendation. To create more engaging events, a community-academic partnership, We Engage 4 Health (WE4H), co-created 11 unique 4-panel comic-style stories designed to be read aloud together as attendees visit each event table. These colorful stories are shared on boards that stand on each table and are offered in both English and Spanish at this time. Many tables also have an accompanying hands-on activity. Together, they lead to meaningful "low stakes" discussions which support understanding of seemingly complex health information. Story topics include the cause of cancer (Cells Gone Wrong), cancer risk factors (Reducing Your Risk), the role of primary care in cancer screening (Primary Care for Prevention), the purpose of research (short Research Ready) and details about specific cancer types (Combatting Colon Cancer, Blocking Breast Cancer, Looking for Lung Cancer, Silencing Skin Cancer, Hindering HPV, and Professional Prostate Protection) and COVID-19 (Take Your Best Shot FAQs). A health passport is used to facilitate table visitation and survey collection at each table enables meaningful evaluation of the event as well as provides the community hosts and their partners baseline cancer data to inform future programing. In 2022, WE4H and the University of Cincinnati Cancer Center partnered with three different communities to co-host pilot events that served over 100 adult residents. Community, research interns and university students volunteered to work the tables at the event and received training prior. Post event surveys and discussions indicated that community partners appreciated the different take on a health fair event. Most volunteers indicated that they would enjoy volunteering again. Attendees indicated that they liked the graphic-style story format used and most preferred it to text and text with graphics approaches. Taken together, the data indicates that Reducing Your Risk events are useful in meaningfully engaging hard to reach, at risk attendees. Additional in-person and virtual events are being planned for 2023 as an approach to reach the medically underserved throughout our region.
ABSTRACT
The appearance of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in 2020 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus set tasks for doctors of various specialties to quickly diagnose, treat, and develop effective rehabilitation measures. The medical community's knowledge about the respiratory tract lesions pathogenesis course in COVID-19 is going to improve, but the key accents placement in understanding this pathology course continues today. Suspected SARS-CoV-2 virus reference points are as follows: vascular endothelial dysfunction, coagulopathy, thrombosis resembling the antiphospholipid syndrome. Treatment is carried out in accordance with general recommendations aimed at the average patient despite the higher secondary infectious complications risk in patients suffering from cancer and a high severe COVID-19 risk. A successful inpatient treatment experience in patients suffering from comorbid pulmonary pathology and a new coronavirus infection is demonstrated on a separate example. The treatment duration and the complexity of selecting a rehabilitation measures course were due to the patient's history of central squamous cell lung cancer, surgical intervention (bilobectomy), radio- and chemotherapy, as well as complications in the form of pulmonary embolism. The concomitant respiratory pathology was differentiated (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) during examination and treatment and basic therapy was selected, which made the medical rehabilitation stage more effective. The patient's condition required a more careful selection of combined anti-inflammatory, broncholytic, mucolytic, and antibacterial therapy than in patients without concomitant pathology. Treatment and a complex of rehabilitation measures, normalization of respiratory function, compensation for concomitant bronchopulmonary pathology was possible to be achieves as a result of the diagnosis of concomitant bronchopulmonary pathology. Careful diagnostic search and optimal treatment of all somatic pathology are important factors in the selection of adequate therapy for elderly patients suffering from coronavirus infection with comorbid pulmonary pathology. All rights reserved © Eco-Vector, 2022.